Drawer 20183033 (Page 2)

(View all drawers)
Title Documents
[REPORT] SUPPORT OF ARMOR UNITS ATTACHED TO INFANTRY UNITS DURING THE ATTACK
[REPORT] SUMMARY COURTS-MARTIAL
[REPORT] SHOULD THE PROFESSIONAL INFANTRY OFFICER BE REQUIRED TO TAKE SPECIAL OPERATION TRAINING?
[REPORT] SHOULD THE MACHINE GUN, 7.62MM, M60, REPLACE THE RIFLE, 7.62MM, M14, (MODIFIED) AS THE RIFLE SQUAD'S AUTOMATIC WEAPON IN THE INFANTRY AIRBORNE BATTALIONS
[REPORT] SHOULD THE CURRENT INFANTRY SQUAD BE REVISED TO PERMIT APPLICATION OF THE FIRE TEAM CONCEPT?
[REPORT] SHOULD THE BATTLE GROUP HAVE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TO PROVIDE AIR OBSERVATION AND TO OPERATE BATTLE GROUP OBSERVATION POST?
[REPORT] SHOULD THE 81MM MORTAR REPLACE THE 60MM MORTAR INFANTRY COMPANY
[REPORT] SHOULD THE 81MM MORTAR REPLACE THE 60MM MORTAR IN THE INFANTRY RIFLE COMPANY
[REPORT] SHOULD THE 106MM RECOILLESS RIFLE, MOUNTED ON THE 1/4 TON TRUCK BE ORGANIC ON THE INFANTRY RIFLE COMPANY
[REPORT] SHOULD THE 106MM RECOILLESS RIFLE, MOUNTED ON THE 1/4 TON TRUCK BE ORGANIC ON THE INFANTRY RIFLE COMPANY
[REPORT] SHOULD THE 106MM RECOILLESS RIFLE, MOUNTED ON THE 1/4 TON TRUCK BE ORGANIC ON THE INFANTRY RIFLE COMPANY
[REPORT] SHOULD EVERY INFANTRY SOLDIER BE TRAINED TO OPERATE ALL WEAPONS ORGANIC TO THE RIFLE COMPANY?
[REPORT] SHOULD BREVET PROMOTIONS TO A TEMPORARY RANK, COMMENSURATE WITH RESPONSIBILITIES, BE INSTITUTED FOR OFFICERS WITHIN THE INFANTRY REGIMENT
[REPORT] SHOULD BATTLE GROUPS BE COMMANDED BY LIEUTENANT COLONELS?
[REPORT] SHOULD ARMY TRAINING PROGRAMS BE PUBLISHED AS A DIRECTIVE RATHER THAN AS A GUIDE?
[REPORT] SHOULD AN AIRBORNE RANGER BATTALION BE ORGANIZED AND ASSIGNED ON A PERMANENT BASIS
[REPORT] SHOULD ALL INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS, ORGANIC TO THE BATTLE GROUP, HAVE AN INDIRECT FIRE CAPABILITY
[REPORT] SHOULD ALL INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS, ORGANIC TO THE BATTLE GROUP, HAVE AN INDIRECT FIRE CAPABILITY
[REPORT] SHOULD A 66 MM MORTAR OR SIMILAR WEAPON REPLACE THE 81 MM MORTAR AT THE RIFLE COMPANY LEVEL
[REPORT] RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING FOR ROTC UNITS